Completed quickly and followed instructions given. Grammar, spelling, etc. was all good as well. Thank you so much! Will hire in the future.
The article/study identifies two major categories of response by social workers that are not helpful. These are labeled as “disenchantment through avoidance” and “disenchantment through action.” The article goes on to list several scenarios under these two broad headings in which these conditions occur.
A) For this post, choose two (2) of the scenarios. List each scenario (i.e. Redefining the woman’s version as questionable”) then summarize how it impacted the women’s experience or behavior (i.e. they learned to tell an unassailable story”). Discuss what you could do to improve your capacity for effective response to survivors and what actions you could take to avoid the negative impacts of this response. Use the “Implications for Practice” section in the article to support your solution(s).
B) Use APA format. Cite properly to the article, and any other materials or readings from the course. Synthesize this information and connect other materials to this article.
C) Comment on one other post, and connect it to your insights from this exercise, with the goal of sharing and supporting each other toward competent and effective response to survivors of abuse. Use evidence-based sources to support your statements. “I like your post” or “It’s a good post” are not acceptable responses. Explain or quote what statements you agree with from the original poster, and then explain why you agree or support it and use citations to the course materials to back it up. You shouldn’t agree or support it unless you have an evidence-based reason for doing so. Likewise, you can challenge a statement or position, and use course materials/third party sources to support that. But do so respectively. Use this forum to have a high-level discussion which is rooted in research with only supported statements cited to their sources. Experts can disagree, but they need to back up why so a principled meaningful discussion can take place. I want to see that you’ve researched your positions using peer-reviewed sources.
TO BE CLEAR: I’m not looking for your personal recommendations or to see if you have a sense of what effective response looks like from your personal experience. I’m SPECIFICALLY looking for your ability to link and adopt recommendations from the literature to support your positions in favor of or in opposition to what is being shared. So please make it clear in your response which practices from the implications section you are adopting to address each scenario, and cite to course materials or third-party peer-reviewed research to support your statements.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more